Q: What does a QA Architect do in a team, and what skills are needed for this job?
A; To me, (although different organizations will have different definitions) the test architect is a person who understands testing at a very in-depth level and is responsible for things such as:
- Designing test frameworks for test automation and testing in general
- Directing and coordinating the implementation of test automation and other test tools
- Designing test environments
- Providing guidance on the selection of the most effective test design techniques in a given situation
- Providing guidance on technical types of testing such as performance testing and security testing
- Designing methods for the creation of test data
- Coordinating testing with release processes
The terms "architect" in many organizations implies a very deep level of understanding and is a highly respected position. The expectations are pretty high. The architect can provide guidance on things that the test manager may not have technical knowledge about. Yet, the test architect can focus on testing and not have to deal with administrative things that managers deal with.
Follow-up question: "What kind of company is more likely to have such a role? A large company or a smaller company? When you say "directing and coordinating" sounds like communicating across teams, like QA, dev, dev ops, DBA to get things done."
A: I would say that you would likely find the role in companies that truly understand the role and value of testing. For example, they know that QA does not equal testing. It would be an interesting project to research how many companies in a sample group would have test architect as a defined role. I would tend to think of larger companies being more likely to have a test architect, but I've seen smaller software companies with test architects and larger companies with no one in any type of test leadership or designer role.
Another indication might be those companies that have a more centralized testing function, such as testing center of excellence. I have some misgivings about the COE approach in that they often fail because people see them as little bureaucracies instead of support. Also, they tend to try to "take over the world" in a company in terms of test practice. The lifespan of a testing COE is often less than 2 years from what I have seen. It's good money for testing consultants to come in and establish the COE, but then they leave (or get asked to leave) and the energy/interest goes away.
And...the company would need to see the need for both functional and technical testing. You need a test architect to put those pieces together.
This is not "command and control" but rather design and facilitation. And you are right, the test architect role touches many other areas, tasks and people.
Follow-up Question: What kind of tools? I'm assuming you're talking more than handy shell scripts. Simulators? Rest clients like postman customizations?
A: Right, the tools are typically high-end commercial tools, but there is a trend toward open source tools and frameworks. One of my friends calls the big commercial tool approach "Big Pharma". The key is that the test architect knows how to define a framework where the tools can work together. This can include the customized homegrown tools as well. Those can be handy.
By the way, the term "framework" can have many meanings. The way I'm using the term here is a structure for test design and test automation that allows functional testers to focus on understanding the application under test and design (and implement) good tests, with the technical testers building and maintaining the technical side of automation.
We also have to expand the view to include not only test automation, but other support tools as well, such as incident management, configuration management and others. For example, there is a great opportunity to use tools to greatly reduce the time needed for test design. Tools such as ACTS (from nist.gov) and Hexawise can be helpful for combinatorial testing, test data generators are needed for test automation and performance testing, and I'm especially keen on model-based testing when the model is used to generate tests (not the manual approach). I think BenderRBT does a great job in designing tests from requirements. Grid Tools has recently introduced a tool called Agile Designer to design tests based on workflow. I'll have more information on that in an upcoming post.
What Does it Take to Become a Test Architect?
I suppose one could take many paths. However, I would not automatically assume someone in an SDET (Software Developer in Test) would be qualified. That's because more than just the technical perspective is needed. The test architect also needs to understand the business processes used in the organization. Personally, I think people at this level, or who aspire to it, would profit by studying Enterprise Architecture. My favorite is the Zachman Enterprise Architecture Framework.
I would look for:
1. Knowledge and understanding at a deep level - Not the superficial knowledge that most people never get past. This means that they know about metrics, code complexity, reliability modeling, performance modeling, security vulnerabilities - all at an advanced to expert level. This is why I encourage people who are on the certification path to go beyond foundation and on to advanced and expert levels of training. This also includes being a continuous learner and reading good books in the testing field and related disciplines. I would start with Boris Beizer's "Software Testing Techniques, 2nd Ed."
2. Meaningful experience - At the risk of just putting an arbitrary number of years as the baseline, I would think at least eight to ten years of solid test design, tool application and perhaps software design and development would be needed. You need a decent portfolio of work to show you have what it takes to work in the role.
3. Great interpersonal skills - The test architect has to negotiate at times and exert influence to get their ideas across. They have to get along with others to function as part of the larger organizational team. Of course, this also includes developers, test managers and development architects. Just because you are a guru doesn't mean you have to be a stubborn and contentious jerk.
4. Objectivity - When choosing between alternative approaches and tools, objectivity is needed.
5. Problem Solving - This requires a creative approach to solving problems and seeing challenges from different angles. It's not uncommon for solutions to be devised where no one has gone before.
I hope this helps raise the awareness of this important role.
Questions or comments? I'm happy to address them!